http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/tm_objectid=14472336%26method=full%26siteid=50143%26headline=boy%2d%2d14%2d%2din%2dvideo%2dgame%2dcopycat%2dmurder-name_page.html
Now, whenever a media form gets blamed by the media themselves for the death of an individual, I immediately sit up in interest, because 9 times out of 10, the accusations are truly unfounded, and blasphemous towards the company who created said media. Here's where I pick out why this Manhunt article is an absolute disgrace, and why Rockstar North should be looking to sue The Mirror for it.
"Stefan Pakeerah, 14, was battered to death by Warren LeBlanc, 17, who was obsessed with the 18-rated Playstation 2 game Manhunt. It awards points to a "hero" for murdering people and was banned in New Zealand six months ago."
First off, anyone can commit a crime, and then claim to be obsessed with a film, video game, TV show, etc, that they claim influenced them to do what they did. But on the flipside, he genuinely could have been obsessed with Manhunt but I fail to see where this problem lies with the creator's. My mum's obsessed with Elvis. I see people who create websites dedicated to their favourite mass murderer's. But they shouldn't be blasted just because they have a fascination with something which isn't considered the social 'norm.
Secondly, it does not award points to a "hero". You play a criminal in Manhunt, and while you never actually find out what crime he committed to be sentenced to death by lethal injection, you know it had to be pretty bad for such punishment to be carried through. I can understand how some idiot kid could sit there thinking, "WOW! I'm going to be playing as a sick criminal!", but that's down to the kid's interpretation of what's being presented before him. I can tell you for a fact that not once in the game is your character ever portrayed as being a hero. Every character in the game is as sick and evil as the other, only some are moreso. The article only concentrates on the fact you gain points for murdering people, like that's the only way. It doesn't comment on how you also gain points for being as quick through a level as possible, sometimes skipping the killing parts so as to get those extra 'time' points. Typical.
"Stefan's father Patrick, a 41-year-old civil servant, said: "Stefan's murder compares to how the game is set out, using weapons like hammers and knives."
If you mean how the killer in this case killed his victim with a hammer and knife as in the game then yeah, you're right it does compare. But in your son's murder, where there such incidences as the killer being directed by a higher voice? Did your son's murderer dress up in a pig suit and wish he had a chainsaw instead? Was your son's murderer a fucking unwilling participant in a snuff video, for which a very tiny microscopic but thriving community eagerly await it's release? No, there wasn't, he didn't, and he wasn't. Manhunt is a million miles away from what happened with your son. Here's another game which compares with what happened to your son:
http://www.gamespot.com/gamecube/action/supersmashbrosmelee/screens.html?page=169
http://www.gamespot.com/gamecube/action/supersmashbrosmelee/screens.html?page=168
The game I refer to is Super Smash Bros. Melee which can be found on Nintendo's Gamecube console, a console which targets the younger audience of games players. The two images show you a very popular Nintendo character known as Kirby (and to my closest friends as my spokesman ;) ) using a hammer, and a sword, in which he can beat up and destroy his enemies to take victory. And if you think Manhunt is crude in its scoring system, you'll find SSBM's just sickening, as it rewards you for special techniques used, only using weapons, defeating your opponent by throwing them over a ledge, ending the match with a 'Smash' move (which basically means your character used a super charged impact move to send your opponent flying to their doom), and yet because this is a 'cute' looking game, it never got picked up on, and Manhunt instead is dragged through the mud. Let's carry on...
"The violence can most certainly be attributed to that game - and if games like this influence kids they should be taken off the shelves."
So, every single kid who plays a video game with even the slightest hint of violence within, they're going to turn into psycho mass murderer's. Ok then, why not go back to the 80's where Super Mario was jumping on monster's heads to kill them. HE WAS JUMPING ON THEIR FUCKING HEADS!!! if you jump on someone's head in today's society, they're liable to suffer a very, VERY serious injury, with possible permanent damage sustained. But nope, that's ok, because Mario is a cute character who only hurts monsters, and not humans. Ah, ok then.
"The object of Manhunt is not to just to go out and kill people. It's a point-scoring game where you increase your score depending on how violent the killing is. That explains why Stefan's murder was as horrific as it was. If these games influence kids to go out and kill then we do not want them in the shops."
Just so you know, not once throughout the article does the Mirror ask why a 17yr old child has in their possession a copy of Manhunt. They must have forgot this little detail. Also, they hastily forgot to mention how there's sections in Manhunt where you have to protect your family, and members of the public from being murdered too. But then the article wouldn't be any fun then would it?
"Manhunt explores the depths of human depravity in a vicious, sadistic tale of urban horror. I think there are an awful lot of youngsters who have access to video games that they shouldn't."
And so, this is Rockstar North's fault because...? I fail to see how their kid having a game which is was illegal for him to play is the company who made the game's fault. The parents are solely to blame and you can't argue with that. How did this 17yr old come to own this game then?
1. If the parent's didn't know he'd bought it, where did he get the money from?
2. If he HAD saved up the money from birthday's and pocket money or even a job, then why didn't the shop ask him for ID, because he does look drastically young?
3. Maybe he had asked his parents to buy it for him, and them being so clued up on the world of video games (just wait till you see what his uncle had to say on the matter) decided to go and buy their child a game with disturbingly sick and gory content, to please him.
4. Maybe he just lent it off a friend, and his parents were truly unaware he even had it.
"Retail chain Dixons today reacted swiftly to the outcry and removed all copies of Manhunt from its shelves."
The stupid idiots wait for the game to be mentioned all across the press, TV, and radio before they pull it off the shelves. This game will rise in the charts because of this coverage, so how ironic that while everyone's shouting off about the game's content, they don't realise at the same time they're lining the coffers of the very company they're trying to bring down. This part I DO sit back and smile with glee at. :D
"Last night, a spokesman for the Entertainment and Leisure Software Publishers' Association said: "We reject any suggestion or association between the tragic events in the Midlands and the sale of the video game Manhunt. "The game in question is classified 18 by the British Board of Film Classification and therefore should not be in the possession of a juvenile. There is no evidence to suggest a link with events carried out in everyday life, as many eminent experts have continually concluded."
Whoever this dude was should be applauded, because they say exactly what i've said throughout this blog.
All of this was just from the Mirror's web-site. In their actual excuse for a tabloid, they interviewed the victim's uncle, and he had the following to say... brace yourselves...
Stefan's uncle, airline worker Gary Broomes, 39, likened the games to child pornography, saying people who watched it were "more likely to commit acts of paedophilia". He said: This game is about taking a life and yet it is legal."
Just read that paragraph again. Not even people who 'played' Manhunt but people who 'watched' it. WHAT THE FUCK??? So, let me get this straight then; I own Manhunt, have played it all the way through and completed it, enjoying it so much that I immediately started playing it again from the start and that makes me a paedophile. Carl Houghton is a paedophile because he played a very violent game, a game which NEVER brings children into its storyline, nor do you ever even actually see children in it, but you're still a paedophile because you kill fully grown adults. That's the biggest load of shite I ever fucking heard. The uncle amazingly goes on to dig himself an even bigger hole:
He added: "If they had brought out a game that encouraged people to kill animals there would be an outrage. The fact that it is humans doesn't seem to matter.
Again, another pause for you to grasp this lunatic's jabberings... The guy doesn't seem to comprehend the idea that guess what?? There ARE COUNTLESS GAMES OUT THERE WHICH INVOLVE THE MAIN IDEA BEING TO KILL ANIMALS!!! From the top of my head I can think of Deer Hunter, Duck Hunt, Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis involves using a snake to choke out a muskrat, in Banjo-Kazooie, Banjo-Tooie, Conker's Bad Fur Day, there's instances in each of killing animals, and not only with conventional jumping or punch / kick methods either. But nope, according to this tool who obviously has never played a game in his life, there are no such games involving the deaths of animals out there.
I could go on, and on, and on, but I think i've made my point. As if I didn't already hate our tabloid newspapers enough, the Mirror comes along and finally buries the ol' red-tops for good in my opinion. This article was an absolute travesty, and one which doesn't justify the paper it has wasted in it being published. I will never ever buy a tabloid ever again.
I've sent the following letter to The Mirror's mailbox, in response to their disgusting article:
I was absolutely disgusted by the amateurish approach taken to your front-page story dealing with the 17 yr old killer and his 14 yr old victim, which all revolved around the video game 'Manhunt', sold on Playstation 2. I have never felt the need to send any newspaper my views on a story i've read, but today's article made me boil with fury. Just so you know, this is one less reader of your tabloid, and also of any tabloid out there on release. You've shown yourselves to be extremely inept at research the actual story you're writing, and because of this, have tarnished the reputation of a videogame developer which in the world of videogames, is held in very high regard by fans of that media form. I have also never felt offended by anything, but when I read the uncle's comments about how people who play 'Manhunt' should be considered 'paedophiles', I was rocked to the core. I am a huge fan of 'Manhunt', am 20 yrs old, and have never, ever felt the need to abuse a child after playing the game. I would like to see an apology to all the people out there who have bought the game and enjoy it on a regular basis, for being labelled as child molestor's in your newspaper. It was absolutely disgusting.
Carl Houghton
PS: Go buy Manhunt, it's one of the most under-rated, and greatest games the PS2 has ever. If you're old enough that is. And if you're not, don't try getting it through other ways, because i'd hate to see a hard-working high-street employer being sacked for the wrong reasons.